Boaters Voice Concerns about Dyke Marsh, Marina
The National Park Service is taking comments on its website until June 20 about the four restoration options for Dyke Marsh.
Boaters from the Belle Haven Marina are voicing their concerns about the possible restoration of Dyke Marsh Wildlife Preserve and its impact on the marina.
Decision time is approaching fast. The National Park Service is taking comments on its website until June 20 about four restoration options for Dyke Marsh.
Concept A means no restoration action would be taken. Concept B proposes “minimum restoration,” and Concept C provides “moderate restoration.” Concept D includes an option of placing fill around the Belle Haven Marina, which boaters say could limit their access.
Although none of the four options mentions doing away with the marina, Capt. Steve Chaconas fears for the marina's future. He said he doesn't particuarly like any of the restoration options but supports Concept A over the others.
“They make no mention of preserving or restoring the marina,” Chaconas said. “These people want to close Belle Haven Marina. Their argument is we’re disturbing the birds. If you go down (to the marina), you will see an osprey’s nest at the boat ramp. … If boaters are interfering with the natural habitat, you can’t tell by those birds right there.”
Belle Haven Marina is an access point to the Potomac River and also houses the Mariner Sailing School. Sailboats, canoes and kayaks are available for rent.
“We have very little access to the Potomac River,” Chaconas said. “Belle Haven is a jewel not only in its location but (in) providing access."
He added, "It’s a great way for people to get out and enjoy the water.”
George Stevens, president of Belle Haven Marina Inc., said he thinks Concept D does not make sense for marina.
“We’re the largest full-time sailing school on the river, and we would hate to see that terminated — filling the marina just doesn’t make any sense whatsoever,” he said.
Stevens said a combination between the propositions presented in Concept C and Concept D would make most sense. Economically, Stevens said, Concept B is most realistic.
Chaconas said he is also concerned about the cost of the different concepts, as the park service hasn't provided price estimates on any of the options.
The advocacy group Friends of Dyke Marsh has endorsed the full restoration of Dyke Marsh and preservation of the Belle Haven Marina. The environment committee of the Mount Vernon Council of Citizens Associations has taken the same position, said Friends of Dyke Marsh President Glenda Booth.
Boaters are not cited as an impact on Dyke Marsh, according to the park service. The U.S. National Geological Survey has found ongoing erosion of the marsh, but dredging was named one of the forefront problems. Before the National Park Service began overseeing Dyke Marsh in 1973, large parts of the marsh were dredged for sand and gravel.
See the newsletter and a comments form here on the National Park Service website.
monkeyrotica
8:58 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
What kind of "wildlife preserve" allows idiots to run their dogs off leash to chase the birds? Lets preserve the marsh by issuing some $500 fines for being an idiot.
Kerry
1:56 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
The "friends" of Dyke Marsh would like to see the complete disbarrment of any human beings anywhere near the river. I understand the need to care for the marsh, but the marina is a great thing, and there is very little public access there. Also, you can rent kayaks and get out and enjoy the river, where else can you dod that in NOVA? There needs to be a balance. Good for Capt. Chaconas to speak up, I hope that they can fight off the environmentalist overreach.
Henry Wharton
10:27 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Please, don't even think about shutting down the marina. This is where kids learn to fish & sail. People need Belle Haven Marina to be improved, or left pretty much like it is. What is the world coming to? People need this option for sanity sake. Henry W.
Henry Wharton
10:28 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Thanks for signing me up. Henry
Kevin O'Rourke
12:24 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012
Did everyone read the article? I didn't see one thing that metioned anything about closing the marina. I agree with Mr Stevens that concept B or C make the most sense.
Martin Tillett
11:48 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012
In every instance where I've attended a public conversation or meeting on this issue, closing of the Marina was not a component of the presented plans. There was shown a portion of open water currently used for boat moorings that could become a restored area or it may remain as is. The focus was on examining each option and then for people with an interest in the outcome to weigh in on what they did or did not like. The US Park Service asks for input to help them come up with a plan. Too many people are reacting to rumors that have no basis in truth. It is nonsensical to say that an environmental organization supporting the marsh wants people barred from the area. The educational aspects covering the benefits and ecological service functions of marshes is best when citizens are actively engaged in visiting the area for passive nature observation by walking on trails or exploring the channels within the marsh with canoes and kayaks. There are already science professionals conducting natural history studies and educators and youth leaders teaching young people in this environment. People that are educated and understanding of how this natural system works and have learned to enjoy the space are the best future advocates for preserving this wonderful ecosystem. Barring access would on further jeopardize the future of this marsh. The plans that call for marsh restoration are a great opportunity to transform an area of the river to what it was like in George Washington's time.
Kevin O'Rourke
12:26 pm on Sunday, June 10, 2012
Well put Mr Tillet!